CONTENTS
Posted:
4/15/11 Obama’s State of Union Address
4/25/11 Obama’s State of Union Address, Part II
5/3/11 Four Billionaires Speak Out
5/31/11 Oil Executives Testify [5-12-11]
7/5/11 Refuting…[Alan Reynolds memo]
7/28/11 Most Republicans are Bad Men: Why? I will Tell You
7/25/11 Obama’s Debt Crisis Speech
8/15/11 The Super Committee
8/26/11 Republican Rick Perry is an Idiot and a Phony Christian
8/23/11 My New Book
9/13/11 Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate--Tidbit
9/23/11 Nine more books sent to the following:
10/3/11 Eli Broad, the Consummate Tax-Dodger
1/2/12 2011
1/6/12 George McGovern is Right!
1/27/12 Gingrich is a bad choice for the US President
2/13/12 Eight Reasons not to vote for Mitt Romney
8/20/12 Mitt Romney picks Rep. Paul Ryan--for VP
8/25/12 Romney’s Veep Pick, Part II
10/16/12 The Presidential Debate Analysis
12/24/12 The Fiscal Cliff—Boogeyman!
1/3/13 President Obama Blows His Golden Opportunity to Reform the decrepit and unfair
U.S. Tax Code the--Second Time!
1/24/13 Tweets for January, 2013
1/24/13 Obama’s [2013] inauguration speech had numerous defects: I will mention a few!
2/1/13 Is President Barack Obama stupid?
2/14/13 Email sent to ex-President Carter
2/14/13 Fax sent to former VP Al Gore
2/14/13 Sen. Marco Rubio
3/5/13 Proposition 8
3/27/13 It is Simple!
4/30/13 Is Bill Moyers a coward or stupid?
5/6/13 Barack, Michelle, and Jason
6/10/13 Billionaire Ronald Perelman is part Right and Wrong
Excerpt from the book [posted 7/28/11]:
And, the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court ruling made it easier to buy elections: claiming the flood of millions of dollars into super-pacs from corporations, associations, and wealthy individuals—is protected by the First Amendment. That is false. Justice Kennedy, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote the majority opinion, and he is wrong. Any interpretation of the First Amendment that gives wealthy individuals and corporations, using their enormous wealth, to takes away the power of people power to govern themselves was not intended by the Founding Fathers.
What the First Amendment says, ‘Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech or the press”—referring to people. Corporations are not people—they don’t vote. They don’t have a voice box. It is better if people represent themselves, than be represented by corporations. Their goal is to maximize profits: the people have different goals: living wage, clean air and water, safe products, healthcare, protection from consumer fraud, public services, and the rule of the people.
President Theodore Roosevelt asserted the need for campaign finance reform and the Tillman Act of 1907 banned corporate contributions.
The First Amendment does not state--you cannot limit the amount a wealthy individual or corporation can donate to a political advertising—for the purpose of influencing elections. The ruling of the Supreme Court says, unabridged speech mean: Congress cannot limit political donations aimed at influencing elections or referendums. That is miles off course.
Justice Kennedy: thinks, because, the 1st Amendment states: Congress cannot abridge the freedom of speech—it can’t limit political donations. However, that is defective reasoning.
Available at the Kindle bookstore for $6.99:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Book-Guardian-Walter-Picca-ebook/dp/B00GU1JESM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385147555&sr=8-1&keywords=the+book+of+the+tax+guardian
Posted:
4/15/11 Obama’s State of Union Address
4/25/11 Obama’s State of Union Address, Part II
5/3/11 Four Billionaires Speak Out
5/31/11 Oil Executives Testify [5-12-11]
7/5/11 Refuting…[Alan Reynolds memo]
7/28/11 Most Republicans are Bad Men: Why? I will Tell You
7/25/11 Obama’s Debt Crisis Speech
8/15/11 The Super Committee
8/26/11 Republican Rick Perry is an Idiot and a Phony Christian
8/23/11 My New Book
9/13/11 Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate--Tidbit
9/23/11 Nine more books sent to the following:
10/3/11 Eli Broad, the Consummate Tax-Dodger
1/2/12 2011
1/6/12 George McGovern is Right!
1/27/12 Gingrich is a bad choice for the US President
2/13/12 Eight Reasons not to vote for Mitt Romney
8/20/12 Mitt Romney picks Rep. Paul Ryan--for VP
8/25/12 Romney’s Veep Pick, Part II
10/16/12 The Presidential Debate Analysis
12/24/12 The Fiscal Cliff—Boogeyman!
1/3/13 President Obama Blows His Golden Opportunity to Reform the decrepit and unfair
U.S. Tax Code the--Second Time!
1/24/13 Tweets for January, 2013
1/24/13 Obama’s [2013] inauguration speech had numerous defects: I will mention a few!
2/1/13 Is President Barack Obama stupid?
2/14/13 Email sent to ex-President Carter
2/14/13 Fax sent to former VP Al Gore
2/14/13 Sen. Marco Rubio
3/5/13 Proposition 8
3/27/13 It is Simple!
4/30/13 Is Bill Moyers a coward or stupid?
5/6/13 Barack, Michelle, and Jason
6/10/13 Billionaire Ronald Perelman is part Right and Wrong
Excerpt from the book [posted 7/28/11]:
And, the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court ruling made it easier to buy elections: claiming the flood of millions of dollars into super-pacs from corporations, associations, and wealthy individuals—is protected by the First Amendment. That is false. Justice Kennedy, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote the majority opinion, and he is wrong. Any interpretation of the First Amendment that gives wealthy individuals and corporations, using their enormous wealth, to takes away the power of people power to govern themselves was not intended by the Founding Fathers.
What the First Amendment says, ‘Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech or the press”—referring to people. Corporations are not people—they don’t vote. They don’t have a voice box. It is better if people represent themselves, than be represented by corporations. Their goal is to maximize profits: the people have different goals: living wage, clean air and water, safe products, healthcare, protection from consumer fraud, public services, and the rule of the people.
President Theodore Roosevelt asserted the need for campaign finance reform and the Tillman Act of 1907 banned corporate contributions.
The First Amendment does not state--you cannot limit the amount a wealthy individual or corporation can donate to a political advertising—for the purpose of influencing elections. The ruling of the Supreme Court says, unabridged speech mean: Congress cannot limit political donations aimed at influencing elections or referendums. That is miles off course.
Justice Kennedy: thinks, because, the 1st Amendment states: Congress cannot abridge the freedom of speech—it can’t limit political donations. However, that is defective reasoning.
Available at the Kindle bookstore for $6.99:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Book-Guardian-Walter-Picca-ebook/dp/B00GU1JESM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385147555&sr=8-1&keywords=the+book+of+the+tax+guardian
Foreword:
Selected postings from my Blog: THETAXGUARDIAN.COM
Table of Contents
1. Posted: 8/13/10 Judge Vaughn Walker is wrong
2. Posted: Dec. 24, 2O12 [snippet]
3. Posted: 3/5/13 Proposition 8
4. Posted: 3/27/13 It is Simple!
5. Posted: 5/6/13 Barack, Michelle, Jason
6. Posted: 9/4/13 The UK
[Queen Elizabeth II—opposes God]
The USA
Excerpt from the book:
And, President Obama, not only did not defend DOMA, he said: “I applaud the Supreme Court’s decision.” He is the anti-Christ. The ruling invalids DOMA, § 3, a law passed by Congress in 1996—that prohibits same-sex marriages from qualifying for the same legal and tax benefits of opposite‑sex marriages, who by procreation become mother and father: that does not happen in same sex unions. Majority opinion written by Anthony Kennedy with four other justices joined: consisting of 26 pages of legalistic bias-nonsense, omits important facts, contains mostly filer—a bog of dozens of non-related court cases that supposedly support his [wrong] opinion. This document regards the case of the United States v. Windsor. Edith Windsor is seeking a refund of $363,053 in federal estate taxes paid. She married Thea Spyer, her lesbian partner, in Ontario, Canada in 2007, when same-sex marriage was not legal in N.Y. and not recognized by federal law. The death of Thea Spyer took place in 2009, when the estate tax was in effect. The Supreme Court ruled: this Canadian marriage invalidates the federal estate tax law. That is mistake # 1. These two women lived together for 40 years: two years before the death of one, they decide to get married in Canada, which recognizes same-sex marriages, to avoid the US estate tax: that in itself, should be illegal. What won the heart of the three female Supreme Court justices: the plaintiff was female. I don’t believe they understood the rest of the fa-cock-ta S.C. document. Legal rulings are supposed to run on tracks, like, trains; however, this ruling ran completely off the tracks. Here is a list of 34 more errors:
CALIFORNIA
[PROPOSITION 8]
Los Angeles
[L.A. Mayor Villagaigosa officiates gay-marriage]
Two New Products of the U.S. Courts
The U.S. Courts Commits Two Crimes
The Four Dissenting Justices
[Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas]
Copyright © 2010-13 by Walter F. Picca
On sale available at kindle fire bookstore for $1.99
http://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Defense-Marriage-Proposition-ebook/dp/B00F4K0T02/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1379385360&sr=8-1&keywords=walter+picca
Selected postings from my Blog: THETAXGUARDIAN.COM
Table of Contents
1. Posted: 8/13/10 Judge Vaughn Walker is wrong
2. Posted: Dec. 24, 2O12 [snippet]
3. Posted: 3/5/13 Proposition 8
4. Posted: 3/27/13 It is Simple!
5. Posted: 5/6/13 Barack, Michelle, Jason
6. Posted: 9/4/13 The UK
[Queen Elizabeth II—opposes God]
The USA
Excerpt from the book:
And, President Obama, not only did not defend DOMA, he said: “I applaud the Supreme Court’s decision.” He is the anti-Christ. The ruling invalids DOMA, § 3, a law passed by Congress in 1996—that prohibits same-sex marriages from qualifying for the same legal and tax benefits of opposite‑sex marriages, who by procreation become mother and father: that does not happen in same sex unions. Majority opinion written by Anthony Kennedy with four other justices joined: consisting of 26 pages of legalistic bias-nonsense, omits important facts, contains mostly filer—a bog of dozens of non-related court cases that supposedly support his [wrong] opinion. This document regards the case of the United States v. Windsor. Edith Windsor is seeking a refund of $363,053 in federal estate taxes paid. She married Thea Spyer, her lesbian partner, in Ontario, Canada in 2007, when same-sex marriage was not legal in N.Y. and not recognized by federal law. The death of Thea Spyer took place in 2009, when the estate tax was in effect. The Supreme Court ruled: this Canadian marriage invalidates the federal estate tax law. That is mistake # 1. These two women lived together for 40 years: two years before the death of one, they decide to get married in Canada, which recognizes same-sex marriages, to avoid the US estate tax: that in itself, should be illegal. What won the heart of the three female Supreme Court justices: the plaintiff was female. I don’t believe they understood the rest of the fa-cock-ta S.C. document. Legal rulings are supposed to run on tracks, like, trains; however, this ruling ran completely off the tracks. Here is a list of 34 more errors:
CALIFORNIA
[PROPOSITION 8]
Los Angeles
[L.A. Mayor Villagaigosa officiates gay-marriage]
Two New Products of the U.S. Courts
The U.S. Courts Commits Two Crimes
The Four Dissenting Justices
[Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas]
Copyright © 2010-13 by Walter F. Picca
On sale available at kindle fire bookstore for $1.99
http://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Defense-Marriage-Proposition-ebook/dp/B00F4K0T02/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1379385360&sr=8-1&keywords=walter+picca
On Sale available at the Kindle Fire bookstore on Amazon.com for $6.95
http://www.amazon.com/The-Tax-Guardian-Walter-Picca/dp/146201965X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380902294&sr=8-1&keywords=the+tax+guardian
http://www.amazon.com/The-Tax-Guardian-Walter-Picca/dp/146201965X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380902294&sr=8-1&keywords=the+tax+guardian
On sale at iUniverse Publishing and other internet sites: Print on demand
available at iUniverse Publishing and other internet sites
On sale at iUniverse Publishing other Internet sites
No longer available as an E-book.